Noon Report: Thrombocytopenia, Elevated PTT

Written by:

Hey everyone,

Some pearls from today’s teaching:

Resources

  • Bloody Easy Coagulation handbook – coagulation pathway, anticoagulation basics, approach to abnormal coagulation tests

Approach to thrombocytopenia

  • Clinical evaluation should include:
    • History: Mucocutaneous bleeding, constitutional symptoms, PMHx (cancer, HIV, autoimmune disease), medications (anticoagulants)
    • Physical: Vitals, evidence of bleeding (mucous membranes, epistaxis, petechiae/purpura), lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly
  • Indications for platelet transfusion (Canadian Blood Services, AABB/ICTMG systematic reviews):
    • PLT < 100 neuraxial surgery, head trauma/CNS hemorrhage
    • PLT < 50 major non-neuraxial surgery, epidural anesthesia/lumbar puncture
    • PLT < 30 therapeutic anticoagulation that cannot be stopped
    • PLT < 20 percutaneous procedures other than LP/epidural anesthesia
    • PLT < 10 for any non-immune thrombocytopenia (prophylaxis against spontaneous ICH)
      • For ITP – “case specific” – “one dose, for life-threatening bleeding only and consult a hematologist”

Approach to isolated PTT elevation

  • Represents a problem with the intrinsic pathway
  • What causes elevated PTT?
    • Congenital: Factor 8 and 9 (Hemophilia A and B) > vWD with low factor 8, factor 11
    • Acquired:
      • Factor inhibitor (commonly against factor 8)
      • Non-specific inhibitors
        • Heparin/DOAC
        • Lupus anticoagulants targetting coagulation proteins bound to phospholipids – LA are antiphospholipid Ab that interfere with lab assays for clotting, do not represent increased bleeding risk and in fact increase risk of thrombosis.
  • How to investigate:
    • Rule out heparin/DOAC
    • Assess for lupus anticoagulant
      • DRVVT (snake venom enzymes activate central pathway factor 5 and 10, which excludes any deficiency/specific inhibitors of intrinsic pathway factors, thus allows you to assess for assay interference due to LA).
        • Screening test uses a reagent with low phospholipids, which should be neutralized due to LA – thus clotting time increases.
        • Subsequent confirmatory test uses a reagent with high phospholipids, which should not be fully neutralized – thus clotting time decreases.
      • Can do a mixing study (similar to below, but uses a PTT lupus anticoagulant insensitive reagent with phospholipid substrates that are not neutralized by LA in the assay – will see normalization of the PTT)
    • Mixing studies – 50:50 mix of normal plasma and patient’s sample. If aPTT corrects on mixing -> factor deficiency. If aPTT does not correct -> inhibitor. If there is partial correction, possibly elements of both inhibitor and deficiency. Can then go on to get specific factor levels (generally 8 and 9).

Leave a comment